In Battlefield 6, the Celeron G3900 is much slower than the Ryzen 9 7950X3D. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Celeron G3900
- Consumes up to 57% less energy – 51 vs 120 Watts
- Consumes up to 57% less energy
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Up to 161% faster in Battlefield 6 – 159 vs 61 FPS
- Up to 161% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 7 years and 4 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Sep 01, 2015
- Is 7 years and 4 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Celeron G3900 vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D: Comparison of performance and price
Celeron G3900
Sep 1st, 2015
Average FPS
61 FPS
38%
Min 1% FPS
46 FPS
39%
Price, $
$44.04
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.72/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron G3900 vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron G3900 vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron G3900
Sep 1st, 2015
Cores
2-core
12%
L3 Cache
4 MB
3%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
67%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
41%
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
128 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron G3900 Sep 1st, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 9 7950X3D Jan 4th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2015 | Released | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| – | MSRP | $699.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | AM5 |
51 W | Power Consumption | 120 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2133 MHz (DDR3), 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 5200 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 510 | Integrated GPU | Radeon Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
