Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700K is 2583 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Celeron G3900
- Up to 61% cheaper than Core i7-13700K - £119.95 vs £307.67
- Up to 43% better value when playing World of Warcraft than Core i7-13700K - £0.76 vs £1.34 per FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Core i7-13700K - 51 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i7-13700K
- Performs up to 46% better in World of Warcraft than Celeron G3900 - 230 vs 158 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 24 vs 2 threads
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
158
69%
Value, £/FPS
£0.76/FPS
100%
Price, £
£119.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £119.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 290 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
230
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.34/FPS
57%
Price, £
£307.67
38%
FPS Winner
Buy for £307.67 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 290 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G3900 | vs | Core i7-13700K |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Skylake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |