In Battlefield 6, the Celeron G1840 is quite a bit slower than the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Celeron G1840
- Consumes up to 81% less energy – 54 vs 280 Watts
- Consumes up to 81% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
- Up to 51% faster in Battlefield 6 – 92 vs 61 FPS
- Up to 51% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 5 years and 6 months newer – Nov 25, 2019 vs May 01, 2014
- Is 5 years and 6 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Celeron G1840 vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X: Comparison of performance and price
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
Nov 25th, 2019
Average FPS
92 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
69 FPS
100%
Price, $
$1629.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$17.71/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron G1840 vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 6 Single-Core
1652
100%
Geekbench 6 Multi-Core
13962
100%
Performance Specifications
The Celeron G1840 vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron G1840
May 1st, 2014
Cores
2-core
6%
L3 Cache
3 MB
2%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
76%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
Nov 25th, 2019
Cores
32-core
100%
L3 Cache
128 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron G1840 May 1st, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen Threadripper 3970X Nov 25th, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
| – | MSRP | $1,999.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | TRX4 |
54W | Power Consumption | 280W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
