Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5700X3D outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1840 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 5700X3D is 3539 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1840.
Advantages of Celeron G1840
- Up to 79% cheaper than Ryzen 7 5700X3D - £49.95 vs £239.56
- Up to 73% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen 7 5700X3D - £0.55 vs £2.07 per FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D - 53 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 7 5700X3D
- Performs up to 27% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Celeron G1840 - 116 vs 91 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 16 vs 2 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
91
78%
Value, £/FPS
£0.55/FPS
100%
Price, £
£49.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £49.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 57 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
116
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.07/FPS
27%
Price, £
£239.56
20%
FPS Winner
Buy for £239.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 57 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1840 | vs | Ryzen 7 5700X3D |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Haswell | Codename | Not Available |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 105 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |