Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1840 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600 is 1893 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1840.
Advantages of Celeron G1840
- Up to 51% cheaper than Ryzen 5 3600 - £49.95 vs £101.21
- Up to 48% better value when playing Mass Effect: Andromeda than Ryzen 5 3600 - £0.24 vs £0.46 per FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3600 - 53 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 5 3600
- Performs up to 6% better in Mass Effect: Andromeda than Celeron G1840 - 219 vs 207 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 12 vs 2 threads
Mass Effect: Andromeda
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
207
95%
Value, £/FPS
£0.24/FPS
100%
Price, £
£49.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £49.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65 minutes ago
Buy for £101.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1840 | vs | Ryzen 5 3600 |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Haswell | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |