The Celeron G1830 is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Ryzen 5 3400G. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Celeron G1830
- Consumes up to 18% less energy – 53 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of the Ryzen 5 3400G
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 8 vs 2 threads
Celeron G1830 vs Ryzen 5 3400G for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Celeron G1830
Dec 1st, 2013
Average FPS
168
93%
Min 1% FPS
113
94%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock
Ryzen 5 3400G
Jul 7th, 2019
Average FPS
180
100%
Min 1% FPS
120
100%
Price, £
£73.79
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.4/FPS
100%
Celeron G1830 vs Ryzen 5 3400G in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron G1830 vs Ryzen 5 3400G in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron G1830 vs Ryzen 5 3400G in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron G1830
Dec 1st, 2013
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
75%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
76%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen 5 3400G
Jul 7th, 2019
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
4 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Celeron G1830 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Ryzen 5 3400G |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $149.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
| Haswell | Codename | Picasso |
53 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Performance | ||
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.7 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Frequency | 4.2 GHz |
| 3 MB | L3 Cache | 4 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | DDR4 @ 2933 MHz |
| Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
