Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600 is 2044 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Celeron G1820
- Up to 94% cheaper than Ryzen 5 3600 - £5.99 vs £101.40
- Up to 92% better value when playing Valorant than Ryzen 5 3600 - £0.01 vs £0.13 per FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3600 - 53 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 5 3600
- Performs up to 16% better in Valorant than Celeron G1820 - 797 vs 687 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 12 vs 2 threads
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
687
86%
Value, £/FPS
£0.01/FPS
100%
Price, £
£5.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £5.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7428 minutes ago
Buy for £101.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7428 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1820 | vs | Ryzen 5 3600 |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Haswell | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |