The Celeron G1620 is a slower gaming CPU than the Core i3-14100. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i3-14100
- A much faster gaming CPU than the Celeron G1620
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than the Celeron G1620 – 8 vs 2 threads
Celeron G1620 vs Core i3-14100 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Celeron G1620
Dec 3rd, 2012
Average FPS
166
80%
Min 1% FPS
112
82%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock
Core i3-14100
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
208
100%
Min 1% FPS
137
100%
Price, £
£106.97
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.51/FPS
100%
Celeron G1620 vs Core i3-14100 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron G1620 vs Core i3-14100 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron G1620 vs Core i3-14100 in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron G1620
Dec 3rd, 2012
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
2 MB
17%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
77%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i3-14100
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Celeron G1620 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i3-14100 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $134.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| 55 W | Power Consumption | Not Available |
| Performance | ||
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Frequency | 4.7 GHz |
| 2 MB | L3 Cache | 12 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz, DDR5 @ 4800 MHz |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
