Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 4500 outperforms Celeron G1610T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 4500 is 3409 days newer than Celeron G1610T.
Advantages of Celeron G1610T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 4500 - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 4500 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 5 4500
- Performs up to 34% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Celeron G1610T - 577 vs 431 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610T - 12 vs 2 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G1610T
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Ryzen 5 4500
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1610T | vs | Ryzen 5 4500 |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 4th, 2022 |
| Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Not Available |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 2 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 23.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
