Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900KF outperforms Celeron G1610T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900KF is 3970 days newer than Celeron G1610T.
Advantages of Celeron G1610T
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i9-14900KF
- Performs up to 435% better in Immortals of Aveum than Celeron G1610T - 107 vs 20 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610T - 32 vs 2 threads
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G1610T
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Core i9-14900KF
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1610T | vs | Core i9-14900KF |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 24 |
| 2 | Threads | 32 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
| 35 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 23.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
