Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900KF outperforms Celeron B820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900KF is 4125 days newer than Celeron B820.
Advantages of Celeron B820
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i9-14900KF
- Performs up to 67% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Celeron B820 - 285 vs 171 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B820 - 32 vs 2 threads
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Celeron B820
Mobile • Jul 1st, 2012
Core i9-14900KF
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron B820 | vs | Core i9-14900KF |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 24 |
| 2 | Threads | 32 |
| 1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
| 35 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 17.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
