The Celeron B815 is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i7-9700. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Celeron B815
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of the Core i7-9700
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 8 vs 2 threads
Celeron B815 vs Core i7-9700 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Celeron B815
Jan 1st, 2012
Average FPS
163
86%
Min 1% FPS
110
88%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock
Core i7-9700
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
189
100%
Min 1% FPS
125
100%
Price, £
£206.66
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.09/FPS
100%
Celeron B815 vs Core i7-9700 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron B815 vs Core i7-9700 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron B815 vs Core i7-9700 in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron B815
Jan 1st, 2012
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
2 MB
17%
Base Frequency
1.6 GHz
53%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-9700
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Celeron B815 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i7-9700 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $333.00 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Performance | ||
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 1.6 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.0 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Frequency | 4.7 GHz |
| 2 MB | L3 Cache | 12 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | DDR4 @ 2666 MHz |
| Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
