Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms Celeron B815 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 3677 days newer than Celeron B815.
Advantages of Celeron B815
- Consumes up to 40% less energy than Intel Core i3-12100F - 35 vs 58 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-12100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 41% better in World of Warcraft than Celeron B815 - 209 vs 148 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B815 - 8 vs 2 threads
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
209
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.33/FPS
100%
Price, £
£70
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8573 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Mobile • Jan 1st, 2012
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron B815 | vs | Core i3-12100F |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
1.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 58 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |