Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 5600G outperforms Celeron 847 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 5600G is 3586 days newer than Celeron 847.
Advantages of Celeron 847
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 5600G - 17 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 5 5600G
- Performs up to 386% better in Immortals of Aveum than Celeron 847 - 68 vs 14 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 847 - 12 vs 2 threads
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron 847
Mobile • Jun 19th, 2011
Ryzen 5 5600G
Desktop • Apr 13th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron 847 | vs | Ryzen 5 5600G |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 19th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 13th, 2021 |
| Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Cezanne |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 2 | Threads | 12 |
| 1.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 11.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
| Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 7 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
