Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms Celeron 847 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 3873 days newer than Celeron 847.
Advantages of Celeron 847
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than Intel Core i3-12100F - 17 vs 58 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-12100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 34% better in Alan Wake 2 than Celeron 847 - 126 vs 94 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 847 - 8 vs 2 threads
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
126
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.56/FPS
100%
Price, £
£70
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 183 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Mobile • Jun 19th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron 847 | vs | Core i3-12100F |
---|---|---|
Jun 19th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
1.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 58 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
11.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |