The Celeron 4305UE is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i3-13100. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Celeron 4305UE
- Consumes up to 75% less energy – 15 vs 60 Watts
Advantages of the Core i3-13100
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 8 vs 2 threads
Celeron 4305UE vs Core i3-13100 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Celeron 4305UE
Oct 1st, 2018
Average FPS
171
84%
Min 1% FPS
115
85%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i3-13100
Jan 4th, 2023
Average FPS
204
100%
Min 1% FPS
135
100%
Price, £
£103.97
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.5/FPS
100%
Celeron 4305UE vs Core i3-13100 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron 4305UE vs Core i3-13100 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron 4305UE vs Core i3-13100 in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron 4305UE
Oct 1st, 2018
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
2 MB
17%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
59%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
44%
Core i3-13100
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Celeron 4305UE | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i3-13100 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Oct 1st, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
$107.00 | MSRP | $134.00 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
Intel BGA 1528 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Whiskey Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
15 W | Power Consumption | 60 W |
Performance | ||
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.0 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Frequency | 4.5 GHz |
2 MB | L3 Cache | 12 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR4 @ 2133 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz, DDR5 @ 4800 MHz |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
No | Overclockable | No |