The Celeron 4205U is a slower gaming CPU than the FX-8320. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Celeron 4205U
- Consumes up to 88% less energy – 15 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of the FX-8320
- A much faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 8 vs 2 threads
Celeron 4205U vs FX-8320 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Celeron 4205U
Jan 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
165
99%
Min 1% FPS
111
99%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
FX-8320
Oct 23rd, 2012
Average FPS
167
100%
Min 1% FPS
112
100%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Celeron 4205U vs FX-8320 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron 4205U vs FX-8320 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron 4205U vs FX-8320 in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron 4205U
Jan 23rd, 2019
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
2 MB
25%
Base Frequency
1.8 GHz
51%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
100%
FX-8320
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Celeron 4205U | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | FX-8320 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
$107.00 | MSRP | $169.00 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1528 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
| Whiskey Lake | Codename | Vishera |
15 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Performance | ||
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 1.8 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Frequency | 3.7 GHz |
| 2 MB | L3 Cache | 8 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 2133 MHz | RAM | DDR3 |
| UHD Graphics 620 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
