The Celeron 4205U is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i7-10700K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Celeron 4205U
- Consumes up to 88% less energy – 15 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of the Core i7-10700K
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 16 vs 2 threads
Celeron 4205U vs Core i7-10700K for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Celeron 4205U
Jan 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
165
86%
Min 1% FPS
111
87%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock
Core i7-10700K
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
192
100%
Min 1% FPS
127
100%
Price, £
£339.99
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.77/FPS
100%
Celeron 4205U vs Core i7-10700K in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron 4205U vs Core i7-10700K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron 4205U vs Core i7-10700K in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron 4205U
Jan 23rd, 2019
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
2 MB
12%
Base Frequency
1.8 GHz
47%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
73%
Core i7-10700K
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Celeron 4205U | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i7-10700K |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Jan 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
$107.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
Intel BGA 1528 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Whiskey Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
15 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
Performance | ||
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
1.8 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Frequency | 5.1 GHz |
2 MB | L3 Cache | 16 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR4 @ 2133 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 2933 MHz |
UHD Graphics 620 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |