In Battlefield 6, the Celeron 3965U is much slower than the Ryzen 9 7950X3D. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Celeron 3965U
- Consumes up to 88% less energy – 15 vs 120 Watts
- Consumes up to 88% less energy
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Up to 161% faster in Battlefield 6 – 159 vs 61 FPS
- Up to 161% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 6 years newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Jan 03, 2017
- Is 6 years newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Celeron 3965U vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron 3965U vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron 3965U vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron 3965U
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
2-core
12%
L3 Cache
2 MB
2%
Base Frequency
2.2 GHz
52%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
41%
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
128 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron 3965U Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 9 7950X3D Jan 4th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Released | Jan 4th, 2023 |
$107.00 | MSRP | $699.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1356 | Socket | AM5 |
15 W | Power Consumption | 120 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3, 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 5200 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD Graphics 610 | Integrated GPU | Radeon Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
