Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900KF outperforms Celeron 3965U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900KF is 2478 days newer than Celeron 3965U.
Advantages of Celeron 3965U
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i9-14900KF
- Performs up to 185% better in The Callisto Protocol than Celeron 3965U - 205 vs 72 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3965U - 32 vs 2 threads
The Callisto Protocol
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron 3965U
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2017
Core i9-14900KF
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron 3965U | vs | Core i9-14900KF |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel BGA 1356 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 24 |
| 2 | Threads | 32 |
| 2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
| 15 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 22.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
