In Battlefield 6, the Celeron 3865U is slower than the Ryzen Threadripper 2920X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Celeron 3865U
- Consumes up to 92% less energy – 15 vs 180 Watts
- Consumes up to 92% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Up to 23% faster in Battlefield 6 – 76 vs 62 FPS
- Up to 23% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 1 year and 8 months newer – Oct 03, 2018 vs Jan 03, 2017
- Is 1 year and 8 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Celeron 3865U vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
Oct 3rd, 2018
Average FPS
76 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
57 FPS
100%
Price, $
$229.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.02/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron 3865U vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron 3865U vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron 3865U
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
2-core
17%
L3 Cache
2 MB
6%
Base Frequency
1.8 GHz
51%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
73%
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
Oct 3rd, 2018
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron 3865U Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen Threadripper 2920X Oct 3rd, 2018 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
$107.00 | MSRP | $649.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1356 | Socket | SP3r2 |
15W | Power Consumption | 180W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3, 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD Graphics 610 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
