Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700KF outperforms Celeron 3865U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10700KF is 1213 days newer than Celeron 3865U.
Advantages of Celeron 3865U
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700KF - 15 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i7-10700KF
- Performs up to 9% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Celeron 3865U - 180 vs 165 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3865U - 16 vs 2 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
180
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.2/FPS
100%
Price, £
£396.68
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £396.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 282 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron 3865U | vs | Core i7-10700KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel BGA 1356 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |