Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5900X outperforms Celeron 3205U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 5900X is 2076 days newer than Celeron 3205U.
Advantages of Celeron 3205U
- Consumes up to 86% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 5900X - 15 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 5900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 9 5900X
- Performs up to 34% better in Battlefield V than Celeron 3205U - 270 vs 201 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3205U - 24 vs 2 threads
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
270
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.76/FPS
100%
Price, £
£204
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £204 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 49 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron 3205U | vs | Ryzen 9 5900X |
---|---|---|
Mar 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Broadwell | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
1.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
15.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |