Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5700X3D outperforms Celeron 3205U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 5700X3D is 3235 days newer than Celeron 3205U.
Advantages of Celeron 3205U
- Consumes up to 86% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D - 15 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 7 5700X3D
- Performs up to 22% better in Overwatch 2 than Celeron 3205U - 380 vs 312 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3205U - 16 vs 2 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
380
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.63/FPS
100%
Price, £
£239.56
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £239.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 48 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron 3205U | vs | Ryzen 7 5700X3D |
---|---|---|
Mar 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Broadwell | Codename | Not Available |
Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
1.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
15.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |