Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600KF outperforms Celeron 3205U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13600KF is 2767 days newer than Celeron 3205U.
Advantages of Celeron 3205U
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600KF - 15 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i5-13600KF
- Performs up to 15% better in Forza Horizon 4 than Celeron 3205U - 339 vs 294 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3205U - 20 vs 2 threads
Forza Horizon 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Celeron 3205U
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Core i5-13600KF
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron 3205U | vs | Core i5-13600KF |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
| Broadwell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 14 |
| 2 | Threads | 20 |
| 1.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 15.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
