Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 5600 outperforms Celeron 1037U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 5600 is 3377 days newer than Celeron 1037U.
Advantages of Celeron 1037U
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 5600 - 17 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 5600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 5 5600
- Performs up to 27% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Celeron 1037U - 143 vs 113 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 1037U - 12 vs 2 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Celeron 1037U
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2013
Ryzen 5 5600
Desktop • Apr 20th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron 1037U | vs | Ryzen 5 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 20th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 20th, 2022 |
| Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Vermeer |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 2 | Threads | 12 |
| 1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
