Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700F outperforms Celeron 1000M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-14700F is 4005 days newer than Celeron 1000M.
Advantages of Celeron 1000M
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-14700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i7-14700F
- Performs up to 86% better in Cyberpunk 2077 than Celeron 1000M - 104 vs 56 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 1000M - 28 vs 2 threads
Cyberpunk 2077
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
Celeron 1000M
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2013
Core i7-14700F
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron 1000M | vs | Core i7-14700F |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 20th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 20 |
| 2 | Threads | 28 |
| 1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
| 35 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
