Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700K outperforms Celeron 1000M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-13700K is 3537 days newer than Celeron 1000M.
Advantages of Celeron 1000M
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i7-13700K - 35 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i7-13700K
- Performs up to 21% better in Baldur's Gate 3 than Celeron 1000M - 131 vs 108 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 1000M - 24 vs 2 threads
Baldur's Gate 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
131
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.64/FPS
100%
Price, £
£346.39
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £346.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 62 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2013
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron 1000M | vs | Core i7-13700K |
---|---|---|
Jan 20th, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |