Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX outperforms Core i7-4800MQ on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX is 3235 days newer than Core i7-4800MQ.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX
- Performs up to 21% better in New World than Core i7-4800MQ - 129 vs 107 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4800MQ - 128 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4800MQ
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX doesn't have integrated graphics
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Mar 8th, 2022
FPS
129
100%
Value, £/FPS
Price, £
FPS Winner
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Mar 8th, 2022
Mobile • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Mar 8th, 2022
Single-Core
1972
100%
Multi-Core
17651
100%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX | vs | Intel Core i7-4800MQ |
---|---|---|
Mar 8th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i7 |
Chagall | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | Intel Socket G3 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
64 | Cores | 4 |
128 | Threads | 8 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 47 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |