Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX outperforms Core i7-2600S on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX is 4076 days newer than Core i7-2600S.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
- Performs up to 18% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-2600S - 201 vs 170 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2600S - 64 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2600S
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX - 65 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
Server/Workstation • Mar 8th, 2022
FPS
201
100%
Value, £/FPS
Price, £
FPS Winner
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
Server/Workstation • Mar 8th, 2022
Core i7-2600S
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
Server/Workstation • Mar 8th, 2022
Single-Core
2038
100%
Multi-Core
16424
100%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX | vs | Intel Core i7-2600S |
|---|---|---|
Mar 8th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i7 |
| Chagall | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
| AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 4 |
64 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 280 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
