Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900F is 539 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-12900F - 128 vs 24 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900F
- Performs up to 26% better in Starfield than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX - 77 vs 61 FPS
- Up to 95% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX - £291.94 vs £5695.0
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
61
79.22077922077922%
Value, £/FPS
Price, £
£5695
5%
Buy for £5,695 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77613 minutes ago
Buy for £291.94 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77612 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Single-Core
1598
62.93816463174478%
Multi-Core
14828
100%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX | vs | Intel Core i9-12900F |
---|---|---|
Jul 14th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 |
Castle Peak | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
64 | Cores | 16 |
128 | Threads | 24 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
280 W | TDP | Not Available |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |