Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX outperforms Core i7-965 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX is 4257 days newer than Core i7-965.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
- Performs up to 10% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i7-965 - 170 vs 154 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-965 - 128 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-965
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX - 130 vs 280 Watts
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
170
100%
Value, £/FPS
Price, £
£5695
100%
FPS Winner
Buy for £5,695 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77030 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Single-Core
485
30.350438047559447%
Multi-Core
1683
11.350148367952523%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX | vs | Intel Core i7-965 |
---|---|---|
Jul 14th, 2020 | Release Date | Nov 17th, 2008 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i7 Extreme |
Castle Peak | Codename | Bloomfield |
AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | Intel Socket 1366 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
64 | Cores | 4 |
128 | Threads | 8 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
280 W | TDP | 130 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |