Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-10600KF outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-10600KF is 75 days older than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10600KF - 128 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600KF
- Performs up to 82% better in Diablo IV than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX - 219 vs 120 FPS
- Up to 97% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX - £168.66 vs £5695.0
- Up to 98% better value when playing Diablo IV than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX - £0.77 vs £47.46 per FPS
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX - 125 vs 280 Watts
Diablo IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
120
54.794520547945204%
Value, £/FPS
£47.46/FPS
1.6224188790560472%
Price, £
£5695
2%
Buy for £5,695 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2427 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
219
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.77/FPS
100%
Price, £
£168.66
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £168.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2427 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Single-Core
1598
94.78054567022538%
Multi-Core
14828
100%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX | vs | Intel Core i5-10600KF |
---|---|---|
Jul 14th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i5 |
Castle Peak | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
64 | Cores | 6 |
128 | Threads | 12 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
280 W | TDP | 125 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |