Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900KF outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900KF is 553 days older than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-9900KF - 64 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900KF
- Performs up to 13% better in Diablo IV than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - 220 vs 195 FPS
- Up to 87% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - £298.66 vs £2378.05
- Consumes up to 66% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - 95 vs 280 Watts
Diablo IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
195
88.63636363636364%
Value, £/FPS
Price, £
£2378.05
12%
Buy for £2,378.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 186 minutes ago
Buy for £298.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 186 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Single-Core
1655
97.87108219988173%
Multi-Core
14579
100%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX | vs | Intel Core i9-9900KF |
---|---|---|
Jul 14th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 |
Castle Peak | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 8 |
64 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
280 W | TDP | 95 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |