Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900KF outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-11900KF is 245 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-11900KF - 64 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900KF
- Performs up to 5% better in Crysis 3 Remastered than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - 194 vs 184 FPS
- Up to 84% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - £368.66 vs £2378.05
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - 125 vs 280 Watts
Crysis 3 Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
184
94.84536082474226%
Value, £/FPS
Price, £
£2378.05
15%
Buy for £2,378.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 186 minutes ago
Buy for £368.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 185 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Single-Core
1655
71.42857142857143%
Multi-Core
14579
100%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX | vs | Intel Core i9-11900KF |
---|---|---|
Jul 14th, 2020 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 |
Castle Peak | Codename | Rocket Lake |
AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 8 |
64 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
280 W | TDP | 125 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |