Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX outperforms the cheaper Core i5-9400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-9400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX is 553 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-9400F.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
- Performs up to 1% better in Dishonored 2 than Core i5-9400F - 268 vs 265 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400F - 64 vs 6 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Up to 96% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - £98.66 vs £2378.05
- Up to 96% better value when playing Dishonored 2 than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - £0.37 vs £8.87 per FPS
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - 65 vs 280 Watts
Dishonored 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
268
100%
Value, £/FPS
£8.87/FPS
4.1713641488162345%
Price, £
£2378.05
4%
FPS Winner
Buy for £2,378.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 95 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
265
98.88059701492537%
Value, £/FPS
£0.37/FPS
100%
Price, £
£98.66
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £98.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 93 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Single-Core
1378
83.26283987915409%
Multi-Core
4834
33.15728102064613%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX | vs | Intel Core i5-9400F |
---|---|---|
Jul 14th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i5 |
Castle Peak | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 6 |
64 | Threads | 6 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
280 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |