Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX is 1190 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
- Performs up to 7% better in Hogwarts Legacy than Ryzen 5 1600 - 89 vs 83 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 1600 - 64 vs 12 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600
- Up to 90% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - £240.28 vs £2378.05
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - 65 vs 280 Watts
Hogwarts Legacy
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
89
100%
Value, £/FPS
Price, £
£2378.05
10%
FPS Winner
Buy for £2,378.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 168 minutes ago
Buy for £240.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 169 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Single-Core
1068
64.53172205438067%
Multi-Core
4578
31.401330681116672%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1600 |
---|---|---|
Jul 14th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Castle Peak | Codename | Summit Ridge |
AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 6 |
64 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
280 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |