Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX outperforms Core i3-10100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX is 75 days newer than Core i3-10100.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
- Performs up to 9% better in F1 23 than Core i3-10100 - 240 vs 221 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10100 - 32 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10100
- Up to 88% better value when playing F1 23 than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - £0.35 vs £2.86 per FPS
- Consumes up to 66% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - 95 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
240
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.86/FPS
12.237762237762237%
Price, £
FPS Winner
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
221
92.08333333333333%
Value, £/FPS
£0.35/FPS
100%
Price, £
£77.27
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £77.27 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 45 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1426
85.0835322195704%
Multi-Core
4215
34.1212660892091%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX | vs | Intel Core i3-10100 |
---|---|---|
Jul 14th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i3 |
Castle Peak | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
280 W | TDP | 95 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |