Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX outperforms FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX is 2633 days newer than FX-6350.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
- Performs up to 23% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than FX-6350 - 133 vs 108 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 24 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX - 125 vs 280 Watts
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
133
100%
Value, £/FPS
Price, £
FPS Winner
Buy for £39.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10077 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • Jul 14th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Jul 14th, 2020
Single-Core
1659
100%
Multi-Core
10709
100%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
---|---|---|
Jul 14th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | FX |
Castle Peak | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 6 |
24 | Threads | 6 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
280 W | TDP | 125 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |