Buy on Amazon
£4,250
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $3990
Availability
MSRP in USD: $3990
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-10900K outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 3990X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-10900K is 83 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 3990X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900K - 128 vs 20 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 2% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Ryzen Threadripper 3990X - 137 vs 134 FPS
- Up to 89% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 3990X - £449.0 vs £4250.0
- Up to 90% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Ryzen Threadripper 3990X - £3.28 vs £31.72 per FPS
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X - 125 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
Buy for £4,250 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 168 minutes ago
Core i9-10900K
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
137
100%
Value, £/FPS
£3.28/FPS
100%
Price, £
£449
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i9-10900K (base stroke: 3.70GHz; socket: LGA1200; 125W) box, BX8070110900K
Buy for £449 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 168 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
Desktop • Feb 7th, 2020
Core i9-10900K
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X | vs | Intel Core i9-10900K |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 7th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 |
| Castle Peak | Codename | Comet Lake |
| AMD Socket TRX4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
64 | Cores | 10 |
128 | Threads | 20 |
| 2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
| 280 W | TDP | 125 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 29.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
