Buy on Amazon
£59.99
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $3990
Availability
MSRP in USD: $3990
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3990X outperforms Core i5-3330 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3990X is 2713 days newer than Core i5-3330.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
- Performs up to 8% better in Borderlands 3 than Core i5-3330 - 213 vs 198 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3330 - 128 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3330
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X - 77 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X doesn't have integrated graphics
Borderlands 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Core i5-3330
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
198
92.95774647887323%
Value, £/FPS
£0.3/FPS
100%
Price, £
£59.99
100%
Value Winner
Intel i5-3330 Ivybridge Box Core i5 Processor (3GHz, 6MB Cache, Socket LGA 1155)
Buy for £59.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2433 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
Desktop • Feb 7th, 2020
Core i5-3330
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-3330
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
555
35.62259306803595%
Multi-Core
1643
11.81674338319908%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X | vs | Intel Core i5-3330 |
|---|---|---|
Feb 7th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i5 |
| Castle Peak | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| AMD Socket TRX4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
64 | Cores | 4 |
128 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 280 W | TDP | 77 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 29.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
