Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3990X outperforms Core i5-10400F on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3990X is 83 days older than Core i5-10400F.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
- Performs up to 9% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-10400F - 205 vs 188 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10400F - 128 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X - 65 vs 280 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
188
91.70731707317074%
Value, £/FPS
£0.47/FPS
100%
Price, £
£88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2427 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Feb 7th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1438
92.29781771501926%
Multi-Core
5751
41.36219792865363%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Feb 7th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i5 |
Castle Peak | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket TRX4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
64 | Cores | 6 |
128 | Threads | 12 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
280 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |