Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3970X outperforms the cheaper Core i9-10900X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-10900X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3970X is 37 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-10900X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
- Performs up to 1% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i9-10900X - 133 vs 132 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900X - 64 vs 20 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900X
- Up to 80% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - £564.99 vs £2798.0
- Up to 80% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - £4.28 vs £21.04 per FPS
- Consumes up to 41% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - 165 vs 280 Watts
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
133
100%
Value, £/FPS
£21.04/FPS
20.34220532319392%
Price, £
£2798
20%
FPS Winner
Buy for £2,798 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1570 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
132
99.24812030075188%
Value, £/FPS
£4.28/FPS
100%
Price, £
£564.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £564.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1570 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Single-Core
1576
96.33251833740832%
Multi-Core
9371
66.89748715019988%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X | vs | Intel Core i9-10900X |
---|---|---|
Nov 25th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 Extreme |
Castle Peak | Codename | Cascade Lake |
AMD Socket TRX4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 10 |
64 | Threads | 20 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
280 W | TDP | 165 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |