Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3970X outperforms Core i3-10320 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3970X is 157 days older than Core i3-10320.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
- Performs up to 9% better in Cities: Skylines II than Core i3-10320 - 36 vs 33 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10320 - 64 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - 65 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X doesn't have integrated graphics
Cities: Skylines II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for £2,798 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 242 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1539
94.07090464547677%
Multi-Core
4626
33.02398629354654%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X | vs | Intel Core i3-10320 |
---|---|---|
Nov 25th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i3 |
Castle Peak | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket TRX4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 4 |
64 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
280 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |