Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3970X outperforms Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3970X is 1546 days newer than Celeron G3900.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
- Performs up to 16% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Celeron G3900 - 194 vs 167 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 64 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Consumes up to 82% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - 51 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for £1,800 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76725 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
35.51344743276283%
Multi-Core
992
7.081667618503712%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Nov 25th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Celeron |
Castle Peak | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket TRX4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 2 |
64 | Threads | 2 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
280 W | TDP | 51 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |