Buy on Amazon
£2,798
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $1999
Availability
MSRP in USD: $1999
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $399
Availability
MSRP in USD: $399
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3970X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 7 1700X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3970X is 998 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 7 1700X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
- Performs up to 6% better in Remnant II than Ryzen 7 1700X - 90 vs 85 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 1700X - 64 vs 16 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 1700X
- Up to 97% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - £79.97 vs £2798.0
- Consumes up to 66% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - 95 vs 280 Watts
Remnant II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X Processor (32C/64T, 128 MB Cache, 4.5 GHz Boost)
Buy for £2,798 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 235 minutes ago
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X Processor - YD170XBCAEWOF
Buy for £79.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 236 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Ryzen 7 1700X
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 7 1700X
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
Single-Core
1088
66.50366748166259%
Multi-Core
5574
39.79154768703598%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 1700X |
|---|---|---|
Nov 25th, 2019 | Release Date | Mar 2nd, 2017 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Castle Peak | Codename | Summit Ridge |
| AMD Socket TRX4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 8 |
64 | Threads | 16 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 280 W | TDP | 95 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
