Buy on Amazon
£1,800
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $1999
Availability
MSRP in USD: $1999
Availability
Availability
No items available
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3970X outperforms Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3970X is 5 days newer than Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
- Performs up to 19% better in Dirt 5 than Athlon 3000G - 192 vs 161 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 64 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - 35 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X doesn't have integrated graphics
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X Processor (32C/64T, 128 MB Cache, 4.5 GHz Boost)
Buy for £1,800 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76743 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Single-Core
957
58.49633251833741%
Multi-Core
1975
14.099086236436323%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
|---|---|---|
Nov 25th, 2019 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Athlon |
| Castle Peak | Codename | Picasso |
| AMD Socket TRX4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 2 |
64 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 280 W | TDP | 35 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.