Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 576 days newer than Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900F - 48 vs 20 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 3% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - 209 vs 202 FPS
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - 65 vs 250 Watts
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
209
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.21/FPS
100%
Price, £
£253.09
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £253.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Oct 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 |
Colfax | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 10 |
48 | Threads | 20 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
250 W | TDP | 65 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |