Buy on Amazon
Out of Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $1299
Availability
MSRP in USD: $1299
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 576 days newer than Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900F - 48 vs 20 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 6% better in Remnant II than Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - 91 vs 86 FPS
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - 65 vs 250 Watts
Remnant II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Core i9-10900F Desktop Processor 10 Cores up to 5.2 GHz Without Processor Graphics LGA 1200 (Intel 400 Series chipset) 65W
Currently N/A on Amazon
Out of Stock
Updated 318 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
Core i9-10900F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
Single-Core
1235
73.68735083532219%
Multi-Core
7407
87.90647994303346%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 |
| Colfax | Codename | Comet Lake |
| AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 10 |
48 | Threads | 20 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
| 250 W | TDP | 65 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.