Key Differences
In short — Core i3-8300 outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-8300 is 230 days older than Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8300 - 48 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8300
- Performs up to 1% better in Valheim than Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - 199 vs 198 FPS
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - 62 vs 250 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Feb 14th, 2018
FPS
199
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.89/FPS
100%
Price, £
£176.66
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £176.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 147 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
Desktop • Feb 14th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
Single-Core
1235
94.92697924673328%
Multi-Core
7407
100%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX | vs | Intel Core i3-8300 |
---|---|---|
Oct 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Feb 14th, 2018 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i3 |
Colfax | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 4 |
48 | Threads | 4 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
250 W | TDP | 62 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |