Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX outperforms Core i3-10105F on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX is 896 days older than Core i3-10105F.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
- Performs up to 0% better in Overwatch 2 than Core i3-10105F - 351 vs 350 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105F - 48 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - 65 vs 250 Watts
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
350
99%
Value, £/FPS
£0.2/FPS
100%
Price, £
£69.22
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £69.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 108 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
---|---|---|
Oct 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i3 |
Colfax | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 4 |
48 | Threads | 8 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
250 W | TDP | 65 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |